dominion Archives - Webber Research
banner

W|EPC: Dominion Energy (D) – Offshore Wind Project Monitor Q320

W|EPC: Dominion Energy (D) – Q320 Offshore Wind Project Monitor

  • Dominion Energy (D) Q320 Capital Project Monitor: Key Takeaways (slide 2)
  • Virginia Clean Energy Act – Why Should You Care? (slide 3)
  • Energy Costs vs. Benefits (slide 4)
  • Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) Project Overview (slide 5)
  • Phase #1: A Closer Look At The Pilot Project (slide 7)
    • Regulatory Approval Timeline
    • EPC Contractor – Ørsted
    • Cost & Schedule Analysis
  • Phase #2: The $8B Main Course (slide 13)
    • Overview & Status
    • How big Are 12MW Offshore Turbines?
    • Offshore Wind: Construction, Risk, & Insurances Overview (slide 16)
    • Conclusions: Thank A Rate Payer (slide 20)

Key Highlights:
• Offshore Wind… An Awesome Opportunity for Dominion, Right?
• Phase #1 Demonstrator Costs Ballooned By ~73%…
• Phase #2 (2.6GW) Is The Real Prize – But Definitely Worth Keeping An Eye On Costs…

For access information please email us at [email protected]

Read More

Southern Company (SO): Vogtle Nuclear Project Q220 Quarterly Monitor

Southern Company (SO) Q2 Vogtle Nuclear Project Monitor – Key Highlights:

• Vogtle Expansion: 6-Years Late…And ~$13-$16 Billion Over Budget? (Slides 2-5)
• How Much Will SO Be On The Hook For? (Slides 3-6)
• Something’s Gotta Give: Key Commissioning Milestones Appear Crammed Together To Avoid ROE Reductions (Slides 6-8)
• Cost Projections Were Already Ramping…Before COVID-19 (Slides 9-12)
• Cost Prudency Reviews – A Make Or Break For Stakeholders?…. (Slides 13-19)

For access information, please email us at [email protected]

  • Quarterly Deep Dive Into Southern Company’s (SO) $27B Vogtle Nuclear Expansion. Southern Company (SO), is the largest owner of the Vogtle Nuclear Facility, via the 46% held by its wholly-owned subsidiary Georgia Power.
    • Vogtle has two active units (Units 1-2), which have been in-service since 1987-89. A two unit expansion (Units 3-4) was approved in 2009
    • Units 3 & 4 were originally expected to be in-service in 2016-17 and cost a combined ~$14B, the expansion project is now 6-7 years behind schedule, with costs rising to ~$27B….and potentially higher (slides 3-6).
    • Hence, the premise of adding a W|EPC Quarterly Vogtle Project Monitor to our Utility & Energy research platform: Digging into those cost overruns – particularly the bulging EPC costs, to get a more accurate and detailed view of the potential headwind for project stakeholders and SO shareholders.

Regulatory Background: Vogtle is regulated by the Georgia Public Service Commission (GPSC). GPSC’s primary role is to protect rate payers & determine if project costs can be justifiably passed-through via utility rates. In the quarters that follow we’ll venture to aggregate, analyze, and interpret cost overruns through the lens of GPSC, to put together a thoughtful estimate of what cost overruns will eventually land with SO shareholders.

For access information, please email us at [email protected]rch.com

Read More